State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Year:
      2017
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      Civil wars
      peace agreements
      peace duration
      peace failure
      regime type
    • Abstract:
      About half of the nations that experience civil war eventually relapse into renewed conflict within a few years after the original war ends. This observation has motivated a stream of research into the factors that affect the risk of peace failure in the aftermath of civil war. While the outcome of the previous civil war—for example, military victory versus peace agreement—structures the post-war environment in ways that affect the risk of peace failure, the capacity of the post-war state to enact and implement policies that affect the incentives for and capacity of groups to undertake armed violence as a means of advancing their interests should also affect the risks of peace failure. Using Geddes’ categories of nondemocratic regime types, we will present a theory of how different regime types have varying capacities to repress and/or implement accommodative policies that affect the risk of peace failure. We test propositions derived from this theory with a series of event history models. Our findings suggest that while peace agreements significantly increase the duration of post-civil war peace, peace agreements involving some types of nondemocratic regimes actually increase the risk of post-civil war peace failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of International Interactions is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • ISSN:
      03050629
    • Accession Number:
      125941621
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      MASON, T. D.; GREIG, J. M. State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War. International Interactions, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 6, p. 967, 2017. Disponível em: http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Mason TD, Greig JM. State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War. International Interactions. 2017;43(6):967. Accessed December 3, 2020. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912
    • APA:
      Mason, T. D., & Greig, J. M. (2017). State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War. International Interactions, 43(6), 967.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Mason, T. David, and J. Michael Greig. 2017. “State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War.” International Interactions 43 (6): 967. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912.
    • Harvard:
      Mason, T. D. and Greig, J. M. (2017) ‘State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War’, International Interactions, 43(6), p. 967. Available at: http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912 (Accessed: 3 December 2020).
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Mason, TD & Greig, JM 2017, ‘State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War’, International Interactions, vol. 43, no. 6, p. 967, viewed 3 December 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Mason, T.David, and J.Michael Greig. “State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War.” International Interactions, vol. 43, no. 6, Nov. 2017, p. 967. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Mason, T. David, and J. Michael Greig. “State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War.” International Interactions 43, no. 6 (November 2017): 967. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Mason TD, Greig JM. State Capacity, Regime Type, and Sustaining the Peace after Civil War. International Interactions [Internet]. 2017 Nov [cited 2020 Dec 3];43(6):967. Available from: http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=125941621&authtype=sso&custid=s5834912